Together or apart?
With regard to separation in school, Helen
Koch (1966, p134) states:
"There have been endless assertions about the hazards
of not keeping twin-pair members apart at school, and the
time for disjoining is usually affirmed to be when the children
enter school. It is a common belief that twins on entrance
to school have, because of their youth, fabulous powers of
adjustment and that dissociation from the sib for a few hours
per day will be no more serious than separation of the child
from the home situation during school hours. It is maintained
that, while in any case, the twin pair will tend to be rivalous,
be concerned about favoritism and being cheated, be given
to indulging in self-comparisons and so forth, all this being
intensified by the twins being enrolled in the same class
and subjected to the constant contrasting that goes on at
the hands of their teachers, classmates and school associates."
"The best policy is a flexible policy"
The start of school is frequently the time that parents focus
upon whether multiple birth children should be together in
the same class or separated into parallel classes.
For many parents, there is no choice as many schools allocate
children into classes without consulting with parents or without
taking into account the potential needs of multiple birth
children.
Our work indicates that both Australian and British parents
and teachers frequently have strong opinions about separation.
Many schools have policies (written and unwritten) declaring
that multiples should be separated in order to help them to
develop as individuals or should be kept together as multiples
are a natural unit. Some schools have rigid organisational
policies that fail to take into account the needs of multiples
e.g. classes are arranged in alphabetical order or birthdate
so multiples have to be kept together. There is no right or
wrong answer with regard to separation in school. The needs
of each child must be considered both as an individual and
as a multiple. No decision should be irreversible and flexibility
is the key word both for parents and teachers.
Separation of multiples is the most common single cause of
conflict between teachers and parents. This section outlines
some of the arguments for and against separation and provides
a checklist to
help parents and teachers make a decision about what is best
for their multiples for that year. It is important to emphasise
that no one can ever class separation as "good"
or "bad" for twins in general. The issue is whether
it is more appropriate or less appropriate for this set of
multiples at this time in their development. There may be
excellent reasons given as to why separation is the best thing
for these children, but there may be just as compelling reasons
why it may be the worst thing for them.
Advantages of separation in school
- The children are able to operate as individuals within
the class situation.
- The teacher is more likely to compare the multiple child
against the peer group instead of his or her co-multiple(s)
- The multiple birth child is able to operate without his
or her co-multiple telling, particularly if he or she is
in trouble
- The multiple birth child has an opportunity to make friends
and socialise as an individual (although this may not be
the case at playtimes and in after-school activities)
Disadvantages of separation in school
- Multiple birth children may need the support of each other
particularly if they have not experienced separation prior
to school
- Even if multiple birth children are comfortable when separated,
they may need to be able to check up on what the other is
doing
- If one child is dominant the dominant child may lose confidence
as he or she no longer has his or her co-multiple(s) to
organise
- The children may be compared more at home particularly
if one appears to be making more progress e.g. gets a reading
book first
- The teachers are less likely to understand how the children
operate as multiples e.g. being upset if one is ill or in
trouble
Does it matter?
Until recently, there has been no good evidence about the benefits or otherwise of separating multiples. Studies done once the multiples are in the school system cannot distinguish whether any problems were pre-existing and the reason for any separation or were caused by the separation. Two recent studies, one in the UK and the other in The Netherlands have shown some negative effects of separation or at least no benefits. The effects were not enormous, but clearly show separation is not a universal solution to issues that may arise with multiples. These studies are discussed in more detail in our article in Early Human Development.
|