Common myths about separation
The Australian Twins in School Survey and the UK survey,
revealed that many teachers had strong ideas about why separation
may be valuable for multiples. While such common views appear
to be very sensible, there is no research evidence to support
them. They may apply to particular sets of multiples, but
not to multiples in general.
"Separation is better for the individual development
of multiples"
Well over 90% of all teachers considered this the most
important value of separation. There are case reports of
some unfortunate twin pairs reared in very bizarre circumstances
where they became totally dependent upon each other and
where separation was an important part of their treatment.
However, there is absolutely NO evidence from any large-scale
studies of multiples that separation helps intellectual
or emotional development in the majority of multiples.
"Separation helps teachers get to know each child
better"
Again this sounds very sensible, but can as easily be turned
to imply the opposite. School is only a modest part of child?s
life and much happens outside. It could be argued that teachers
will know a multiple child better if they also know something
about their co-multiple(s) with whom so much time is spent
outside the classroom.
"Confusion by the teacher may upset multiples"
Obviously this applies more to identical twins. However,
multiples do get used to being mistaken for each other. It
is something they have to learn to live with throughout their
lives. What matters much more is not having other co-multiples
getting the credit for something you did, or you getting the
blame for something they did!
|