Do twins and singleborn children have the same reading problems?
This is a vital question. If the problems are different,
then the interventions used with singleborn children may not
be appropriate for twins. One does have to be cautious in
generalising as many multiples will have just the same problems
as reading-disabled singletons and what works for one will
work just as well for the others. Searching for an intervention
tailored to multiples may be quite unnecessary.
However in the Australian Literacy and Numeracy Survey, what
distinguished the twin boys with inadequate literacy skills
from singeborns who also had problems was that the twin boys
were much more likely:
(i) to have or to have had speech problems.
(ii) to have spelling as well as reading problems
(iii) to have reading reversals where "b"
is read as "d", "p" as "q" etc.
(iv) to have problems in numeracy as well as literacy.
Fairly similar patterns were found in the girls except that
those with difficulties also often lacked motivation. It was
not so much that they could not do a problem, but that they
did not try it or gave-up very readily.
Those twins who were delayed in their reading were often
a lot more careless in their work. Thus the twins with reading
problems were much more likely to tell the time incorrectly
off a clockface or to make mistakes in subtraction of two-digit
numbers. Any specific remediation needs to be directed first
to getting them to approach problems more carefully. Only
once this basic problem has been resolved, is it appropriate
to plan anything more specific about reading.
In intervention, it is important to consider what does not
cause reading disabilities in multiples. Some people believe
that reading problems are closely related to underdeveloped
lateralisation and the use of both rather than just one preferred
hand. Given multiples often are left-handed or are mirror-image
with one right- and one left-handed, it would seem reasonable
to blame reading problems in twins on unusual handedness.
But very detailed studies in Australia have found no relationship
between handedness and reading in the great majority of multiples.
This is not to deny there may be a small group where lateralization
may be an issue and where work with lateralization may help.
|